Subject	why not just have a seperate tune for E-85?
Posted by	FuerGrissa on April 12, 2010 at 12:16 PM
	This message has been viewed 70 times.
In Reply To	Flex Fuel Z32 posted by not4resaleZ on April 12, 2010 at 10:07 AM
Message	or are you saying you want to be able to run any mix of petrol and ethyl without having to tune for it? Ive zero knowledge of this sensor your talking about, but would it really be an accurate enough measure to be safe on a high power motor?
Follow Ups	Flex Fuel Z32 - not4resaleZ 10:07:43 04/12/10 Re: Flex Fuel Z32 - NytWolf 10:48:34 04/12/10 You get lower MPG because of the lower energy content - not4resaleZ 11:07:25 04/12/10 MPG is not a measure of efficiency. - Jehannum 11:10:42 04/12/10 "30% more fuel" required - LJZTT 12:16:01 04/12/10 why not just have a seperate tune for E-85? - FuerGrissa 12:16:54 04/12/10 It would be nice to not have to worry about having different - not4resaleZ 13:50:04 04/12/10 All this negativity.... You need this - kickerzx 14:43:59 04/12/10 And of course, adjust timing. not just fueling.. (n/m) - kickerzx 14:53:18 04/12/10 Thanks for the advice. I like BDE rails, but already have - not4resaleZ 15:44:59 04/12/10 When you come up with a cheap way to - Jehannum 15:13:19 04/12/10 Newer injectors - No problem. (n/m) - kickerzx 15:17:46 04/12/10 Newer injectors are just as susceptible - Jehannum 15:24:06 04/12/10 I think it's a valid question. - not4resaleZ 17:22:50 04/12/10 Are you sure it uses less air per unit of energy released? (n/m) - collegeboy 17:34:33 04/12/10 Using stoich ratios of 9.765 and 14.7 and energy contents - not4resaleZ 19:06:38 04/12/10 Here are the numbers I got from googleing NASIOC e85 - not4resaleZ 19:23:41 04/12/10
Post a Followup	You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.